Knight Vinke Press Release on HSBC PDF Print E-mail

 

 

 

 

Knight Vinke Asset Management LLC  

489 Fifth Avenue  

New York, NY 10017  

Tel:   212 660 5720  

Fax:   212 660 5721  

www.knightvinke.com  

 

  

  

  

Statement by Knight Vinke Asset Management  

concerning HSBC and its decision to write off its investment in Household International  

  

  

New York, NY, 2nd March 2009.  The Board of HSBC has finally accepted that its catastrophic  

investment in Household International, not long ago described by the Chief Executive as a  

“dream portfolio”, is worthless.  The investment has now been fully written off and the business  

is being shut down. Despite this, HSBC continues to carry its U.S. sub‐prime loan assets at $ 34  

billion more than their reported fair value.  If HSBC were ever to write these assets down to  

their fair value, there are a further $ 34 billion of losses to be taken.  We believe that this is  

increasingly likely given that Household is effectively no longer a going concern and that market  

conditions in the United States continue to deteriorate. The Board is now asking shareholders to  

invest a massive $ 18 billion in HSBC. What assurances can it give to the market that this $ 18  

billion of additional capital will not go to Household’s lenders – who, from a contractual point of  

view, have no legal recourse to HSBC?      

  

Knight Vinke, an institutional asset manager, has for two years been calling on HSBC to exit from  

the U.S. sub‐prime market, which is taking up huge amounts of management time and financial  

resources, and to focus more on markets where it has true comparative advantage. It has also  

called for greater board independence and for a compensation structure that better aligns  

shareholder and management interests. Today’s announcement vindicates its campaign.  

  

  

Press Contact details:        

  

David Trenchard, Tulchan Group: +44 207 353 4200   

 

Comments (4)add comment

a guest said:

What about the CEO's comment, "The buck stops here."?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 03, 2009
Votes: +0

a guest said:

I agree with Knight Vinke on all their points here and in their other releases except for walking away from the bondholders. The reputational risk was enormous and with the recent problems with interbank liquidity HSBC probably wouldn't have been able to fund itself as institutions would nolonger trust them. They should have sold it when they had the opportunity.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 03, 2009
Votes: +0

a guest said:

You can debate whether the initial acquisition was sensible or not but they have mismanaged this operation for years and have been in denial. They say that they had offers for it in mid-2007, yet they stayed with it defending the decision to keep it. You are right, more executive hubris. Add them to the list.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 03, 2009
Votes: +0

a guest said:

They were right from the beginning. Most if not all of the other institutional investors kept quite. By going public and actively engaging Knight Vinke has shown the weakness of other institutions.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 03, 2009
Votes: +1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Translate This Website